| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: \df displaying volatility |
| Date: | 2008-05-25 14:05:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20080525140510.GF24891@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe
> > limit it to \df+?
>
> Huh? \df+ has displayed volatility for a long time, and I don't recall
> any great demand to move it into \df.
Hmm, right. Maybe the problem I have is that we made \df+ so wide so as
to be almost useless by now ...
I think this is mostly caused by the "args" column getting too wide.
Can we remove the OUT params from it?
BTW what happened to the idea of displaying only user functions by
default?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-05-25 16:10:40 | Re: \df displaying volatility |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-25 14:01:08 | Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ... |