Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key
Date: 2008-05-11 02:41:56
Message-ID: 20080511024156.GA52350@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:55:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> IMHO a utility command should do one easily-explained thing. The fewer
> options the better.

Sticking to that principle makes for a better-maintained system. I
agree. If we want to point out, "You might rename your index
afterwards to make it look like other default primary keys," I have no
objection.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2008-05-11 04:24:46 Re: ecpg localization
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-11 00:33:24 Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key