Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ
Date: 2008-05-02 16:28:59
Message-ID: 20080502092859.6a65a409@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Fri, 2 May 2008 09:12:32 -0700
"Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I still believe it makes sense to have them separated. I did have
> some data, which has since been destroyed, that suggested there were
> some system characterization differences for OLTP workloads with
> PostgreSQL. Let's hope those disks get delivered to Portland soon. :)

I have those disks.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Regards,
> Mark
>

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-05-02 17:35:27 Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-05-02 16:28:48 Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ