On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:26:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> 1. Inexpensive to implement;
> 2. Unlikely to break most applications;
> 3. Closes off a fairly large class of injection attacks.
>
> The cost/benefit ratio looks pretty good (unlike the idea that started
> this thread...)
That's a much more elegant way of putting what I thought. Thanks,
Tom.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/