Re: pgsql: Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.
Date: 2008-04-25 14:04:11
Message-ID: 20080425140411.GC16601@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:58:32PM +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.

Any chance we can use the active rather than passive voice for that
last hunk? I'm thinking something like, "...if your embedded
architecture requires the database server to run inside the
application process, you cannot use Postgres and should select a
lighter-weight database solution."

Cheers,
David (the passive voice should be avoided ;)
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-25 14:28:51 pgsql: Update to remove passive wording from FAQ, David Fetter
Previous Message User Eggyknap 2008-04-25 11:55:03 pllolcode - pllolcode: Make WTF blocks (switch statements) work.