From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Smith <sodgodofall(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No such file or directory" in a specific combination of transactions with temp tables |
Date: | 2008-04-24 18:23:18 |
Message-ID: | 200804241823.m3OINIU25590@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO:
* Allow prepared transactions with temporary tables created and dropped
in the same transaction, and when an ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS temporary
table is accessed
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg00047.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >>> John Smith wrote:
> >>>> [3] I am not certain how widespread they might be, but I think there
> >>>> may be some backward compatibility concerns with the patch you are
> >>>> proposing.
> >>> Well, the current behavior is certainly broken, so an application
> >>> relying on it is in trouble anyway :-(. Even if we came up with a patch
> >>> for 8.4 to relax the limitation, I doubt it would be safe enough to
> >>> backport to stable branches.
> >> As Heikki pointed out later, PG 8.1 correctly enforces the restriction
> >> against preparing a transaction that has dropped a temp table. It's
> >> only 8.2.x and 8.3.0 that (appear to) allow this. So I'm not persuaded
> >> by backwards-compatibility arguments.
> >>
> >> I've applied Heikki's new patch, and I think that's as much as we can do
> >> for 8.2 and 8.3. Any improvement in the functionality would be new
> >> development (and not trivial development, either) for 8.4 or later.
> >
> > Is there a TODO here?
>
> Yes, please:
>
> "Allow two-phase commit when a temporary table is created and dropped in
> the same transaction, or when an ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS temporary table
> is accessed"
>
> Hmm. If we can do that, I guess we could allow read-only queries on temp
> tables as well.
>
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Browne | 2008-04-24 18:23:32 | Re: MERGE Specification |
Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2008-04-24 18:22:53 | Re: Standard metadata queries |