pgstat SRF?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgstat SRF?
Date: 2008-04-21 13:34:23
Message-ID: 20080421153423.6df7c409@mha-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

While looking over the statistics-for-functions patch
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-03/msg00300.php), I
came back to a thought I've had before - why do we keep one function
per column for pgstat functions, instead of using a set returning
function? Is there some actual reason for this, or is it just legacy
from a time when it was (much) harder to write SRFs?

If there's no actual reason, I think it would be a good idea to make at
least new views added based on SRFs instead....

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-04-21 13:35:10 Re: WAL files format
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-04-21 13:20:05 Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki?