| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
| Date: | 2008-04-14 20:04:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200804142004.m3EK4BE04349@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We should probably try to limit the focus of fests to consider only
> >> actual patches, with design discussions handled "live" during normal
> >> development, the way they've always been in the past.
>
> > We have discouraged design discussions during feature freeze and beta ---
> > do we want to change that?
>
> No, changing that wasn't what I meant to suggest. My point here is that
> we'd dropped a number of big mushy discussions into the queue with the
> idea that they'd be re-opened during commit fest, but new discussion
> did not happen to any useful extent. Conclusion: don't bother putting
> anything less concrete than a patch on the fest queue.
So when/how do those discussions get resolved?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-14 20:12:59 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-14 19:52:06 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |