Re: Commit fest queue

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit fest queue
Date: 2008-04-11 03:18:38
Message-ID: 20080410201838.6319a16a@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:47:34 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > If you have something to add, please do so at some time, but if you
> > are not interested in using a tracker anyway, just don't use it and
> > ignore this thread.
>
> Hmm, well, I can hardly see how anyone could object to a tracker that
> they didn't have to use --- that is, one that hadn't been declared to
> be the new center of our development process. The push-back that
> you're seeing is because just about every proposal for such a tracker
> has included somewhere along the line the notion that the email lists
> will stop being the primary reference.

My suggestion wasn't that in the least.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-11 03:23:20 Re: Commit fest queue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-11 03:01:03 Re: Commit fest queue