| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Date: | 2008-04-10 13:00:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20080410130016.GD4697@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Obviously there are virtues on both sides of this, which is why I think
> we need both mechanisms. The simplest way to integrate them AFAICS
> is to use the tracker as an index on the email traffic.
Agreed.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-10 13:16:02 | Re: [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-10 12:53:04 | Re: Commit fest queue |