Re: Commit fest queue

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commit fest queue
Date: 2008-04-10 12:46:08
Message-ID: 20080410124608.GB4697@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:01:30 -0300
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > I could see it with older submitters, who are used to just sending an
> > email, but the new guys will go with whatever procedure is laid out
> > for them *as long as* it is enforced ...
>
> Just as a note... email can be used as a submission procedure to a
> patch tracker.

Yes, but it sucks, because either you create one for every email, or you
have to give an explicit command to be captured by the system.

I think the "workflow" over email is unstructured enough that there
always needs to be a human to do some selective capturing of
information. As soon as you get into things like creating templates
which patch submitters are supposed to use, it's the about the same as
having to go to the web interface to enter the patch.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2008-04-10 12:47:26 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a
Previous Message Thomas Burdairon 2008-04-10 12:33:39 Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work