| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Headers dependencies cleanup |
| Date: | 2008-04-07 20:53:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20080407205339.GD5095@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
>> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>>
>>> PS: Is there any reason to do not start to use inline functions
>>> instead of macros in some cases?
>>
>> Not all compilers like (== support) inline macros apparently.
>
> Is it your assumption or do you mean some specific compiler? IIRC, inline
> is defined in C99 and my assumption :-) is that it should be supported by
> all compilers today. I try to look on buildmachine, There should be some
> useful configure output.
We have some defensive coding for compilers that do not support it, for
example on pg_list.h ... I have no idea if there's a compiler in actual
use that needs this.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-07 20:58:34 | Re: Headers dependencies cleanup |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-04-07 20:46:52 | Re: Database owner installable modules patch |