| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch |
| Date: | 2008-04-03 15:29:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200804031529.m33FTOk11519@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > ... I suspect anyone wanting to migrate
> > their existing SQL/PSM stuff to Postgres will be less than impressed by
> > our "function body as a string" mechanism.
>
> Yeah, that's the other little problem with claiming standards-compliance
> as a reason for doing this. We'd really have to suck it up and figure
> some other way of parsing function bodies.
Oh, I understand now, that we aren't going to be 100% standards
compliant based on how we quote our function bodies --- I understand
Andrew's point now.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-03 15:50:47 | Re: Configurable Penalty Costs for Levenshtein |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-03 15:20:52 | Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch |