| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Doran <bobtfish(at)bobtfish(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |
| Date: | 2008-03-28 18:21:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20080328182115.GU7464@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tomas Doran wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2008, at 17:23, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Perhaps we could name it received_query() to indicate it is what the
>> backend received and it not necessarily the _current_ query.
>
> reveived_query() sounds like a very sane name for me, and documenting it
> as such would allow you to expose the functionality without the possible
> complaints...
client_query perhaps?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-28 18:32:27 | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-03-28 18:15:46 | Re: Commitfest patches |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-28 18:32:27 | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |
| Previous Message | Tomas Doran | 2008-03-28 17:58:33 | Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query |