| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: \password in psql help |
| Date: | 2008-03-26 15:42:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20080326164201.02bff673@mha-laptop.clients.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:35:22 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >>> The \password command appears to be documented in the psql
> >>> reference page, but not included in the output of the \? command.
> >>> Is there any actual reason for that, or should I just apply the
> >>> attached patch?
>
> > Just to be sure - this is non-backpatch stuff, correct?
>
> You could argue it either way, I think. Lack of documentation is
> a bug, but hardly a critical one. Since you're adding a string it
> would create new work for translators, but it still seems better
> if the entry is there and untranslated than not there at all.
>
Heh, that's only slightly clearer than what I had before I asked the
question ;-) But - will go ahead and backpatch then.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-03-26 15:47:21 | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-26 15:35:22 | Re: \password in psql help |