From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Array behavior oddities |
Date: | 2008-03-26 14:43:49 |
Message-ID: | 200803261443.m2QEhnM21931@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > If any dimension is written as a slice, i.e. contains a colon, then all
> > dimensions are treated as slices.
>
> > Is the the behavior of assuming an entry with no colon is a slice what
> > we want, or are we just stuck with it?
>
> Why do you find that surprising? It's either a slice or it isn't,
> there's no halfway point. Are you proposing to throw an error if only
> some of the subscripts have colons? What would be the point?
>
> > Is there a reason out-of-bounds array accesses behave differently for
> > slices and non-slices?
>
> History (although "sloppy original implementation" would do too). I'm
> not sure if we should try to clean it up --- there've not been that many
> complaints, but I'm sure we'd get complaints from people whose code
> stopped working, if we change it.
I have updated the documention (patch attached) to be clearer on the odd
array slice behavior.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 1.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zubkovsky, Sergey | 2008-03-26 14:44:16 | Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-26 14:40:18 | Re: Surfacing qualifiers |