Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump -i wording

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -i wording
Date: 2008-03-26 14:33:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > I have developed the attached patch with improves wording for the
> > > pg_dump -i (ignore version) option.
> > 
> > I think this is going in exactly the wrong direction --- it makes
> > both the documentation and the warning message less scary not more
> > so.
> OK, updated pg_dump -i wording, more scary.

Updated patch applied, with improved wording when the -i option is

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment: /rtmp/diff
Description: text/x-diff (7.8 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-26 14:40:18
Subject: Re: Surfacing qualifiers
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-26 14:32:23
Subject: pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option.

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-03-26 14:43:15
Subject: Re: \password in psql help
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-26 14:05:53
Subject: Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group