Re: pg_dump -i wording

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -i wording
Date: 2008-03-26 14:33:45
Message-ID: 200803261433.m2QEXjr19797@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > I have developed the attached patch with improves wording for the
> > > pg_dump -i (ignore version) option.
> >
> > I think this is going in exactly the wrong direction --- it makes
> > both the documentation and the warning message less scary not more
> > so.
>
> OK, updated pg_dump -i wording, more scary.

Updated patch applied, with improved wording when the -i option is
specified.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 7.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-26 14:40:18 Re: Surfacing qualifiers
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-26 14:32:23 pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option.

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-03-26 14:43:15 Re: \password in psql help
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-26 14:05:53 Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1