Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure
Date: 2008-03-22 17:48:27
Message-ID: 20080322104827.58cc0436@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:34 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> +1 to the project -- assuming that it means a change of infrastructure
> and not necessarily of tools. I, for one, would oppose changing Mj2
> for Mailman, for instance. (However, whether we use Sendmail or
> Postfix or something else entirely I don't care ...)

Actually this is a good point. We really should define requirements as
part of this, let's not just do it wholesale. Here are a couple:

* Software must be open source?
* Environment must be managed by the community
* Attempt to have admins in each of the following timezones
EST
PST
CET
* I believe with those three we have 24x7 coverage
* FreeBSD is OS?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH5UZrATb/zqfZUUQRAj3+AKCTzb0DFBOyxP5RpYCYAB3/HtmhwwCgqa5y
PcKNhU5HErqP+qmVjLh8cQc=
=fpE7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2008-03-22 17:53:31 Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-22 17:39:34 Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure