Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10
Date: 2008-03-14 15:16:02
Message-ID: 20080314151600.GD2626@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 05:27:09PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
>I haven't found fdatasync to be significantly better in my tests on Linux
>but I never went out of my way to try and quantify it. My understanding
>is that some of the write barrier implementation details on ext3
>filesystems make any sync call a relatively heavy operation but I haven't
>poked at the code yet to figure out why.

Which is why having the checkpoints on a seperate ext2 partition tends
to be a nice win. (Even if its not on a seperate disk.)

Mike Stone

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-14 16:34:43 Re: Lots of "semop" calls under load
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2008-03-14 13:50:05 Lots of "semop" calls under load