Re: Contributor List policy

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Date: 2008-03-12 05:56:49
Message-ID: 20080311225649.5bfba8ef@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:23:25 -0400
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:

> A large part of the problem is that Joshua, for quite some time now,
> has been trying to change the definition of what the contributors on
> this page means.

I have? According to your other posts, my "goals" were in line with
the intent. All I did was change wording.

> Granted he has been smart about it, getting little
> things changed over time to get closer and closer to his end goal.

For the record my original goal was long since served. Which was to
have the list be for "contributors" and under "community" versus
"Developers" and under "developers". The point being of course, to make
sure that attribution to non-c developers was also possible on the list
without confusion. I feel I made that clear when I submitted the patch
3 months ago.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2008-03-12 08:11:35 Re: Contributor List policy
Previous Message Robert Treat 2008-03-12 05:23:25 Re: Contributor List policy