From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commitfest process |
Date: | 2008-03-07 19:46:12 |
Message-ID: | 20080307194612.GB16862@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +0000
> "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
> > wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
> > that's true at least for me. If I want people to review my patch, I'm
> > ready to sing and dance if that's what it takes. But if there's extra
> > steps in reviewing a patch, I might just not bother.
>
> Well that is what my email is about, dropping extra steps :).
I agree that that's a good objective, but I think a Wiki makes for a
crappy patch tracker.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-03-07 19:57:12 | Re: Commitfest process |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-07 19:04:46 | Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful |