| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Nasty bug in heap_page_prune |
| Date: | 2008-03-07 13:07:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20080307130720.GB11041@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Not sure about a clean solution to this. I don't really want to
> bastardize inval.c by making it deal with nontransactional semantics,
> but there may be no other way.
FWIW IIRC we hit precisely this problem while trying to do the
pg_class_nt stuff awhile ago, so if it's overcome as a result of this
HOT bug perhaps we can push forward with the other stuff too.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-07 13:07:24 | Re: 8.3.0 Core with concurrent vacuum fulls |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-03-07 10:52:34 | Re: Grouped Index Tuples |