| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Date: | 2008-03-04 01:31:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200803040131.m241VsO08255@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Decibel! wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think a sane way to think about what Simon would like to accomplish
> > is not "turn psql into a parallel job scheduler"
>
>
> My $0.02: I often find myself wishing I could perform parallel
> operations in psql. There was a proposal for that that came up during
> 8.3 development; whatever happened to it?
The concurrent psql patch was never updated to an acceptable state for
it to be reviewed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-04 01:33:08 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2008-03-04 00:04:59 | Re: pgsql: Don't build the win32 support files in the all target, only in |