| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, Koen Martens <gmc(at)sonologic(dot)nl>, Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: We should get active / Wiki choice |
| Date: | 2008-02-26 11:36:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20080226113631.GN528@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgeu-general |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:31:50AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:59:29AM +0100, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
> > > > However, if you have a properly configured wiki, with good access
> > > > control support, you can take that burden from the user and avoid
> > > > mistakes like that. Mediawiki [...]
> > >
> > > Yes, Mediawiki... well, we know.
> >
> > I don't really know different wikis (and honestly, most of the ones I've
> > worked with I don't really like). But there is one big argument *for*
> > mediawiki: we already have this installed in the PostgreSQL infrastructure,
> > thus it's not an entirely new product that needs to go in. (It's a new
> > install of one, sure, but it's not a new product)
> >
>
> That and it runs on Postgres which I think is an important
> consideration. Yuck, dog food :-p
That's a requirement, I thought ;-) at least TWiki does, though there was
some chatter lately about them not being so interested in it?
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Koen Martens | 2008-02-26 11:46:08 | Re: We should get active / Wiki choice |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-26 11:31:50 | Re: We should get active / Wiki choice |