On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:22:03AM -0800, Warren Turkal wrote:
> As a result, I have a few questions about the timestamp code. In what
> instances is the floating point timestamp recommended? I see that
> Debian and Ubuntu ship packages that use the int64 timestamps. Is the
> backend smart enough to not load and use a database with timestamp
> fields created with the representation not compiled into the compiler?
> And finally, would this work be welcome in PostgreSQL? I view is as a
> kind of beginner janitor type of project to get my feet wet.
AIUI it's because there are systems that have broken 64-integer
support. Or at least, that's the theory. There was a question recently
to check if there really are such systems still running...
Have a nice day,
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
> -- John F Kennedy
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2008-02-26 10:22:58|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-02-26 09:26:04|
|Subject: Re: libpq.rc make rule|