Re: We should get active ...

From: damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>
To: pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: We should get active ...
Date: 2008-02-25 18:41:37
Message-ID: 200802251941.37810.damien@dalibo.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgeu-general


[...]

> >
> > Do we want a wiki? Of course! We probably want TWiki even, because it is
> > the best :) (note: i'm an active member of the TWiki community and
> > therefore not entirely objective, although really, TWiki _is_ the best).
> >

I think the main feature we need for our wiki is some good
internationalisation. I'd like our website to be accessible in serveral
language, not just english.
We definitely need a simple way to edit and translate the pages.
i don't know about TWiki, but dokuwiki has the simpliest multilanguage module
i have ever seen.

http://wiki.splitbrain.org/plugin:translation

> > Will the site be hosted on postgresql infrastructure? Where is it
> > currently hosted? does this have to be done by the postgresql
> > infrastructure management team?
>

As always this discussion has gone quickly into very technical details :-)
Can we start up another thread to discuss **what** we want into the website
and leave here the questions about **how* we are gonna do it ?

>
> In short words (correct this if I am wrong) :
>
> 2 servers (babar and dumbo) are hosted by dalibo at marseille, france.
> The admins are those from postgresql.org.

Actually the servers are named aalderan and barzan :-)

> Pg-eu needs can be handle in a (one or more) freeBSD jail which will be
> or not be in the above servers.
>

As Dave Page pointed out, we need more IP adresses for the servers. Dalibo is
working on it. It should happen soon.

--
damien clochard
http://dalibo.org | http://dalibo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgeu-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2008-02-25 19:21:54 Re: We should get active ...
Previous Message Gabriele Bartolini 2008-02-25 17:32:55 Re: We should get active ...