Re: Patch review

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch review
Date: 2008-02-14 03:51:25
Message-ID: 200802140351.m1E3pPi21608@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> > Pointing to mail messages doesn't help us with any of that. We have to go back
> > and read the original message and make a judgement ourselves what state it's
> > in. If our judgement disagrees with others patches will just sit there with
> > everyone assuming someone else is looking at it.
>
> Agreed. We need that sort of info stored outside the mail list
> discussion itself.

Now that we have comments on the patch queue people can actually claim
items.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2008-02-14 04:52:31 Show INHERIT in \du
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-02-13 21:35:23 Re: Stamping of 8.4

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-02-14 03:55:11 Re: request for 2 mailing lists and archives.postgresql.org updates
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-02-14 03:45:22 Re: access to make changes to archives.postgresql.org, http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/subscribe