Re: Stamping of 8.4

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stamping of 8.4
Date: 2008-02-13 20:51:03
Message-ID: 20080213205103.GS5031@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I admit I am surprised by the library bump. We haven't done anything to
> > the libraries yet, so why bump the versions?
>
> Minor version bump is done unconditionally for each release cycle.

This isn't a *huge* deal, but I'm not sure it's actually appropriate.
We should bump the minor version when we actually add something new to
the library (which is probably just about every time we do a major
version, but still).

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-02-13 20:55:59 Re: Stamping of 8.4
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-02-13 20:50:35 Re: Stamping of 8.4