| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-11 21:18:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20080211211812.GF13934@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andy Colson escribió:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM
>> that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there is
>> an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support such a
>> thing?
>
> I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS. The code can be
> changed in the buildfarm to just run 'svn up' or 'git up and go' (sorry,
> never used git so I had to guess at the command :-) ) right?
In fact I don't see why the buildfarm couldn't be configurable to use
whatever tool/repo the user sees fit. It's easy enough to detect
whether a checked out copy is SVN or git or whatever, and act
accordingly.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Mielke | 2008-02-11 21:20:19 | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Previous Message | Andy Colson | 2008-02-11 21:14:07 | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |