| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-06 16:12:58 |
| Message-ID: | 200802061712.59186.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> I would like to see this tied down some more. The time for the commit
> fests is too open ended. I think we should say something like "All
> commit fests will run no more than two weeks, except for the final
> commit fest which can run for one month."
Something along those lines was discussed, but we feel that because we have no
experience with how commit fests will run, it is unwise to specify that much
detail already. It is quite possible that as we gain experience with the
process the timeline will be clarified.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-06 16:13:49 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2008-02-06 16:10:00 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |