| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Amit jain <amitjain(dot)bit(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Merge condition in postgresql |
| Date: | 2008-02-04 16:09:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20080204160950.GB17150@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:44:17AM -0600, Roberts, Jon wrote:
> If you guys develop Merge for PostgreSQL, I highly suggest putting an
> "order by" statement in the syntax so if the source has duplicates, it
> will insert the first one and then do subsequent updates.
I don't think it would meet the standard definition then. The statement
shouldn't be able to to see the effects of itself...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
> -- John F Kennedy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-02-04 16:20:08 | Re: pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-02-04 16:04:43 | Page-at-a-time Locking Considerations |