Re: Good F/OSS license summary

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Good F/OSS license summary
Date: 2008-02-01 19:31:46
Message-ID: 20080201193146.GD10889@crankycanuck.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:17:19AM -0800, Reece Hart wrote:
>
> Does anyone know of an authoritative, complete, and current license
> comparison? After a lot of trolling, I've been able to satisfy one or
> two of those criteria, but not all.

The FSF has maintained a list of many licenses for years. It's at
<http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/>.

Certified Open Source Initiative licenses are listed at
<http://opensource.org/licenses>.

I think those are the two main resources for this topic.

> It's disappointing that we as a community have yet to converge on just a
> few licenses that differ only by the few characteristics that *really*
> matter (e.g., virality, commercializability, code

Your problem in the above is that your definitions of "community" and
"really matter" may not be congruent with others'.

A

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Calfee 2008-02-01 20:06:33 [Pljava-dev] pljava.dll - bogus error
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2008-02-01 19:30:21 Re: Good F/OSS license summary