Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...]

From: Josh Trutwin <josh(at)trutwins(dot)homeip(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...]
Date: 2008-01-31 02:14:15
Message-ID: 20080130201415.1fc89c3f@joplin.trutwins.homeip.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:20:58 -0500
Tom Hart <tomhart(at)coopfed(dot)org> wrote:

> I have 4 years of mySQL experience (I know, I'm sorry)

Why is this something to apologize for? I used to use MySQL for
everything and now use PostgreSQL for the majority of my DB needs. I
certainly advocate PG now to anyone who will listen, but I don't
think it helps to portray MySQL as a POS or regret its existence.
It's a very useful tool if used correctly. IMO, people who are able
to effectively use PG/MySQL/Oracle/XYZ appropriately are more valuable
than those that blindly use the same one for every single task.

Sorry - I just noticed this in a couple recent posts and I felt like
voicing my $0.02.

Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ow Mun Heng 2008-01-31 02:27:26 Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...]
Previous Message Ow Mun Heng 2008-01-31 02:11:19 Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?