| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable |
| Date: | 2008-01-30 16:00:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20080130160037.GF4536@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD escribió:
>
> > > The plural seems better to me; there's no such thing as a solitary
> > > synchronized scan, no? The whole point of the feature is to affect
> > > the behavior of multiple scans.
> >
> > +1. The plural is important IMHO.
>
> ok, good.
Hmm, if you guys are going to add another GUC variable, please hurry
because we have to translate the description text.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-30 16:36:33 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2008-01-30 13:25:18 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-01-30 16:04:48 | Re: [8.4] Updated WITH clause patch (non-recursive) |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2008-01-30 13:25:18 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable |