Re: OT - pg perl DBI question

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OT - pg perl DBI question
Date: 2008-01-29 18:07:26
Message-ID: 20080129180726.GF26594@crankycanuck.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:14:28AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
>
> I wouldn't trust that library or anything that depends on it if I were
> you. It's been unmaintained for a *very* long time.

Because code rusts when it's sitting around on a hard drive?

Pg.pm doesn't get much attention, I agree, but I've actually never run into
a (n undocumented) bug with it. Also, for simple Perl access for
Postgres-dedicated use, DBI can be a little heavyweight.

A

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Willem Buitendyk 2008-01-29 18:11:38 Analyze Explanation
Previous Message Tom Hart 2008-01-29 18:03:29 Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?