| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE |
| Date: | 2008-01-17 16:37:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20080117083755.1da39af0@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:11:42 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> That would surely defeat the whole point of having this. We want to
> have the same syntax as PL/SQL, not different syntax for the same
> things.
I'm sorry I thought we were developing PostgreSQL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHj4RlATb/zqfZUUQRAmidAKCsRmGkQezCs+KqXOQ860V9g4jDnwCgkIKS
9qdY+ULKlRMucvxideWzjQE=
=REm+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-01-17 16:38:41 | Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-17 16:35:58 | Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets |