Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage

From: User Scrappy <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage
Date: 2008-01-16 16:56:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Dave Page wrote:

> On 16/01/2008, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> wrote:
>> Personally I'd prefer them to be rejected inband so the legitimate
>> sender learns about the problem and reformulate the message accordingly.
> The problem with that is that for 1 legitimate message, there's a
> dozen or more from harvested addresses, the real owners of which won't
> have a clue what the bounce message is about.

Same applies to virus' ... most are forged emails, so sending an email 
back to the Sender saying 'your computer is infect' would both generate 
alot of traffic, and confuse the hell out of the person that didn't send 
the message in the first place :(

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-01-16 17:02:08
Subject: Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-01-16 16:55:11
Subject: Re: [CORE] Egad, what a lot of spammage

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group