From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Best way to index IP data? |
Date: | 2008-01-12 00:43:18 |
Message-ID: | 20080111164318.665c820a@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:21:29 -0500
Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:52:11PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >Steve I think you are speaking of practicality and implementation
> >versus RFC compliance. I believe per the RFC Andrew is correct.
>
> There's an RFC for storing IPs in a database?
Sigh. No. But there is an RFC that declare how IPs are denoted and used.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Mike Stone
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading
> through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command
> to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your message can get through to
> the mailing list cleanly
>
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHiA0oATb/zqfZUUQRAgWNAJ9F+9Kxxazh0QK0z9zcskkG1UhFnQCgpqA1
hGiNsL5wjqxM7bzW6qNJfrE=
=/FxX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-12 00:51:19 | Re: Best way to index IP data? |
Previous Message | Michael Stone | 2008-01-12 00:36:02 | Re: Best way to index IP data? |