Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features
Date: 2006-10-12 04:46:09
Message-ID: 2008.1160628369@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> What is the point of writing a proposal if there is a threat of "will be
> rejected" if one of the people who would do the rejection doesn't at least
> outline what would be acceptable?

FWIW, I said some things about what I'd consider a good design in that
other hints thread on pgsql-performance.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message alexei.vladishev 2006-10-12 05:06:03 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Previous Message alexei.vladishev 2006-10-12 04:39:45 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD