Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?
Date: 2007-12-22 12:21:51
Message-ID: 200712221221.lBMCLpT17535@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


This has been saved for the 8.4 release:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:31:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Well, I wouldn't advocate making it in a minor release, but it's not
> > clear how that translates into saying it can't go into 8.3.
>
> Just because we're well past feature freeze, in beta. I realise this seems
> like a corner case, but the whole point of having betas where functionality
> is more or less frozen is to reduce the liklihood that someone's testing on
> (say) beta 2 is not all completely invalidated on beta 4.
>
> A
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-12-22 13:15:26 Re: Sorting Improvements for 8.4
Previous Message Francisco 2007-12-22 07:07:28 binary decode