Re: New style of hash join proposal

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New style of hash join proposal
Date: 2007-12-22 02:50:08
Message-ID: 200712220250.lBM2o8Y07366@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Decibel! wrote:
> > I fear the real complexity would be (as always) in the planner
> > rather than the
> > executor. I haven't really looked into what it would take to
> > arrange this or
> > how to decide when to do it.
>
> TODO?

This email was added to the 8.4 queue:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

Once we are in 8.4 development we can decide if we are going to
implement it or add it to the TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2007-12-22 03:42:23 timetz range check issue
Previous Message Marc Munro 2007-12-22 00:28:12 Re: function body actors (was: [PERFORM] viewing source code)