Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New style of hash join proposal

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New style of hash join proposal
Date: 2007-12-22 02:50:08
Message-ID: 200712220250.lBM2o8Y07366@momjian.us (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Decibel! wrote:
> > I fear the real complexity would be (as always) in the planner  
> > rather than the
> > executor. I haven't really looked into what it would take to  
> > arrange this or
> > how to decide when to do it.
> 
> TODO?

This email was added to the 8.4 queue:

	http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

Once we are in 8.4 development we can decide if we are going to
implement it or add it to the TODO list.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew ChernowDate: 2007-12-22 03:42:23
Subject: timetz range check issue
Previous:From: Marc MunroDate: 2007-12-22 00:28:12
Subject: Re: function body actors (was: [PERFORM] viewing source code)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group