| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Trevor Talbot <quension(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: viewing source code |
| Date: | 2007-12-20 22:28:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20071220222821.GG11586@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Merlin Moncure escribió:
> I don't really agree that wrapping pl/pgsql with encryptor/decryptor
> is a bad idea.
Right. But do you agree that it is separate from having hidden prosrc?
If we can complete a design then let's shot that way, and aim at
encryption sometime in the future :-)
I have to note that I would probably not be the one to actually produce
a patch in this direction, or even to work on a working, detailed design
:-) You just read Joshua's opinion on this issue and I don't think I
need to say more :-)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-12-20 22:35:47 | Re: viewing source code |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-12-20 22:15:36 | Re: performance index scan vs bitmap-seq scan. |