From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | strange message for moderation: weird list aliases?? |
Date: | 2007-12-12 12:49:38 |
Message-ID: | 20071212124938.GE5607@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Hi,
I just got this message for moderation on the pgsql-patches list:
From: pgsql-patches-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
To: "pgsql-patches-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org"
<pgsql-patches-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:40:14 -0400 (AST)
Subject: Your health is your wealth.Date: s
This is not hard to shot and reject on sight. The strange thing is that
I also got a subsequent message for moderation which was addressed to
the list, saying that this post had just been held for moderation. Huh??
So my question is this: do we have alternate addresses that receive
messages for the list? Is pgsql-patches-postgresql(dot)org(at)postgresql(dot)org a
valid address to which I can send a message and it will be forwarded to
the pgsql-patches list?
If so, I think that is a bogus configuration and should be abolished,
removed, tarred, feathered, burned and banned. Unless there are good
reasons for having it in place.
In fact I think I've seen mail to the lists arrive as
hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot) Is there any reason to have them?
Thanks.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J
Licensee shall have no right to use the Licensed Software
for productive or commercial use. (Licencia de StarOffice 6.0 beta)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-12-12 16:40:00 | Re: strange message for moderation: weird list aliases?? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-12 09:22:46 | Re: Useless "reject patterns" in mail lists |