Re: very slow query

From: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: very slow query
Date: 2007-12-12 11:56:35
Message-ID: 20071212115635.GA4656@a-kretschmer.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

am Wed, dem 12.12.2007, um 11:44:58 +0000 mailte Ashish Karalkar folgendes:
> Hi,
> I am having PostgreSQL 8.2.4 on Suse 10.3
>
> Server is not using the index insted it chooses to take seq scan path. table is
> having @ 120 million rows
>
> here is the output from planner:
> Nested Loop IN Join (cost=0.00..5030217.97 rows=2 width=106)
> -> Seq Scan on sms_new (cost=0.00..5027902.00 rows=384 width=106)
> Filter: (mobile = 919820920858::bigint)
> -> Index Scan using deliveryid_pkey on delivery (cost=0.00..6.02 rows=1
> width=8)
> Index Cond: ("outer".deliveryid = delivery.deliveryid)
> Filter: ((createddate > '2007-12-11 00:00:00'::timestamp without time
> zone) AND (createddate < '2007-12-11 21:00:00'::timestamp without time zone)
> AND ((keyword)::text = 'CRI'::text))
>
> column deliveryid has an index over it in sms_new table.
>
> can anybody please guide to force the usage of index

It's using an index on "deliveryid":
Index Scan using deliveryid_pkey

Do you have an index on "mobile"? Can you show us the table definition
and the output from EXPLAIN ANALYSE?

Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-12-12 12:20:01 Re: Slow PITR restore
Previous Message Jan Sunavec 2007-12-12 11:53:29 convert function