| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: archive_command failures report confusing exit status |
| Date: | 2007-12-11 16:27:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200712111727.39553.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I figured it would make sense if pgarch.c used the same mechanism that
> > postmaster.c uses to report the various variants of regular and signal
> > exits.
>
> Hmm. Getting rid of the "(PID 0)" is going to be a mess enough for
> translations that I think it is worth pgarch.c having its own routine
> for this. Furthermore I think the detailed archive command should be
> reported in an errdetail() field, which makes it even farther off.
Better patch.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| log-archive-command-exitstatus.patch | text/x-diff | 2.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-11 16:54:14 | Re: PGparam proposal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-11 15:45:22 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs |