| From: | Robert Treat <robert(at)omniti(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mason Hale <masonhale(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: partitioned table query question |
| Date: | 2007-12-11 05:14:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200712110014.20720.robert@omniti.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 10 December 2007 20:01, Erik Jones wrote:
> Again, though, is there some better way to go about implementing some
> kind of hash based partitioning in postgres besides this that would
> be more natural wrt queries?
>
One way is to set a static bin id for each partition, then do a select with
where bin_id = mod(2112,3); Where 2112 equals the number your looking for,
and 3 would be the number of buckets.
--
Robert Treat
http://www.omniti.com/
We're Big. On PostgreSQL.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-12-11 05:32:07 | Re: question about warm standby databases in 8.2.5 |
| Previous Message | Colin Wetherbee | 2007-12-11 05:04:36 | Re: SQL design pattern for a delta trigger? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2007-12-11 05:55:28 | Re: Problem of a server gettext message. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-11 05:04:29 | Re: partitioned table query question |