| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: whats the deal with -u ? |
| Date: | 2007-12-10 15:30:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20071210153048.GO5031@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> However, I think we should either get rid of -u or find a way to
> un-deprecate it. Right now, it's undocumented and as far as I can see
> the main effect of having it is to cause confusion such as that which
> started this thread.
>
> On the whole I'm in favor of removing it. It's been undocumented for
> long enough that no one could really complain if it disappears.
I agree that it'd be best to remove it and I don't think it'll cause
problems for it to go away.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-10 15:45:35 | Re: Release Note Changes |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-12-10 15:24:57 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs |