From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Release Note Changes |
Date: | 2007-12-09 19:53:40 |
Message-ID: | 200712091953.lB9Jre128743@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > > I am actually a little worried that companies who sponsor developers
> > > might some day want their company name on the release note item. I am
> > > glad we have not had to make that decision yet. This actually
> >
> > O.k. I will bite :)
> >
> >
> > > highlights a danger of having "giving credit" be a more major part of
> > > the release notes in that companies could ask that they the company be
> > > given credit in the release notes --- something we want to avoid.
> >
> > Why? If a company sponsored the feature why not mention them?
> >
> >
> > Note that I am not arguing one way or the other, but I find the
> > distinction between a individual who is a contributor and a company that
> > is a contributor interesting.
>
> Individual mentions are only so we know who did the work. Company names
> are for advertisement, and that doesn't belong in the release notes.
I am thinking company names for advertisement belong in the press
release.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-12-09 19:55:01 | Re: Release Note Changes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-12-09 19:51:59 | Re: Release Note Changes |