| From: | Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: "distributed checkpoint" |
| Date: | 2007-12-07 07:51:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200712070851.59287.albert@nan-tic.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
A Dijous 06 Desembre 2007, Alvaro Herrera va escriure:
> Am I the only one who finds the phrase "distributed checkpointing" a bit
> awkward? Would it be better if we used "time-distributed checkpointing"
> instead?
>
> The phrase is used in the release notes, but it's not used anywhere in
> the main docs.
To me, non-native english speaker, time-distributed seems the clearer one.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-07 16:08:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-07 06:21:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-12-07 11:27:35 | Re: Problem with ControlFileData structure being ABI dependent |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-07 06:21:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |