Re: Replication Monitoring

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PGSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication Monitoring
Date: 2007-12-06 23:00:19
Message-ID: 20071206230019.GN8451@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Glyn Astill wrote:
> How did that happen? The subject is totally different, so is the
> body.

It has an "In-Reply-To:" and possibly "References:" header which relates
it to the other thread.

The solution is simple. Don't reply to an existing message when you
want to post a new thread. Compose a new one instead.

--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
"Aprender sin pensar es inútil; pensar sin aprender, peligroso" (Confucio)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-12-06 23:10:33 Re: storage size of "bit" data type..
Previous Message lighthouse.software 2007-12-06 22:48:55 Re: ldap authentication allows logon with blank password